Biden’s Peaceful Islam Delusion

The tragedy of the West and especially Christianity is the fact that the absolute majority of their leaders (Clergy, Media, Academics and Politicians) are totally delusional when addressing Islam and or Muslims.

The worst crime committed by Biden in his address on 911 is his false and utterly insane statement that “Islam is a religion of peace” when every single Muslim (whether terrorist or not) is indoctrinated in their mosques with Muhammad’s Quran and his Sunna (traditions about Muhammad in the Hadiths) to wage Jihad against all kuffar/non-Muslims/ infidels.

There is not a single Muslim scholar or imam who can support  this absolutely false description based on their own scripture.

Is there not a single Congress person out of 535 who can point out to Biden that 100% of all acts of terror against non-Muslims are committed by Muslims while shouting the terror verse of “Allahu Akbar” and or justifying their dastardly deeds by quoting verbatim from Muhammad’s Quran justifying their dastardly deeds?

It is most definitely not bigotry or hatred pointing out – based entirely on the Islamic sources – that there is no peace in Islam, since it was Muhammad who 1400 years ago, divided humanity into two irreconcilable groups of Dar al Islam (territory of Muslims) and Dar al Harb (territory of war; all the lands of non-Muslims/ kuffar/ infidels) when he declared total and eternal war against all human beings who are not Muslim. Muhammad mandated in his Quran, that every one of his followers must strive through Jihad (holy war) to make Islamic Sharia the law over planet Earth until all humanity either submits to Allah’s Sharia or be exterminated.

Al Baqara 2.216: “Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know.”

Sahih Muslim Hadith 4631  & 4626 Abu Huraira

“I heard Muhammad say: … I love that I should be killed in Allah’s Cause [Jihad]; then I should be brought back to life and be killed again in Jihad.'”

As Commander-in-Chief, Biden had not only abdicated his responsibility for America’s borders and Afghanistan but he is deliberately and foolishly misleading hundreds of millions of Americans by pretending he knows what Islam is when he is obviously completely Quran ignoramus.

He added more lies by insinuating that Muslims in America are being subjected to hate crimes when all the FBI and Law enforcement statistics prove that this not true and that Jews in particular are targeted by Muslim hate crimes, now more than ever before.

Let me now ask a rhetorical question: Is it possible that the four schools of Sunni Jurisprudence are bigoted, racist or anti-Muslims when they point out the following?

Are the Muslim scholars Islamophobic when they all prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Islam is in perpetual war against all non-Muslims?

Maliki school:

Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering Arab historian, sociologist and one of the greatest philosophers of the Middle Ages, was a Maliki legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah (Introduction), the first work of historical theory, he notes that “in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with “power politics,” because Islam is “under obligation to gain power over other nations.”

Hanbali school:

The great medieval theorist of what is commonly known today as fundamentalist Islam or radical Islam, Ibn Taymiyya (Taqi al-Din Ahmad Ibn Taymiyya, 1263-1328), was a Hanbali jurist. He directed that “since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is Allah’s entirely and Allah’s word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought.”


Hanafi school:

A Hanafi manual of Islamic law repeats the same injunctions. It insists that people must be called to embrace Islam before being fought, “because the Prophet so instructed his commanders, directing them to call the infidels to the faith.” It emphasizes that jihad must not be waged for economic gain, but solely for religious reasons: from the call to Islam “the people will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and not for the sake of taking their property, or making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save themselves from the troubles of war.”

However, “if the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax [jizya], it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon Allah for assistance, and to make war upon them, because Allah is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do.” (Al-Hidayah, II.140)

Shafi’i school:

A Shafi’i manual of Islamic law that was certified in 1991 by the clerics at Al-Azhar University, one of the leading authorities in the Islamic world, as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy, stipulates about jihad that “the caliph (or a Muslim leader) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…until they become Muslim or pay the Jizya (penalty for not being a Muslim)”.   Therte is a further comment by Sheikh Nuh Ali Salman, a Jordanian expert on Islamic jurisprudence: the caliph wages this war only “provided that he has first invited [Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians] to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim penalty (jizya)…while remaining in their ancestral religions.” (‘Umdat al-Salik, o9.8).

Since there is no caliph today, hence the oft-repeated claim by Muslims and their apologists that Osama bin Laden and all such leaders are waging jihad illegitimately, as no state authority has authorized their jihad.

Unfortunately for this explanation is the fact that Muslim Jihadis claim their actions under the concept of defensive jihad, which does not require state authority to call it, and hence becomes “obligatory for every Muslim” (‘Umdat al-Salik, o9.3) if a Muslim land is attacked. The end of the defensive jihad, however, is not peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims as equals: ‘Umdat al-Salik specifies that the warfare against non-Muslims must continue until “the final descent of Jesus.” After that, “nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the Jizya is only effective until Jesus’ descent” (o9.8)

For example, Majid Khadduri,  an Iraqi scholar of Islamic law of international renown points out in his book “War and Peace in the Law of Islam”, which remains one of the most lucid and illuminating works on the subject, says this about jihad:

“The state which is regarded as the instrument for universalizing a certain religion must perforce be an ever expanding state. The Islamic state, whose principal function was to put Allah’s law into practice, sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning ideology over the entire world….The jihad was therefore employed as an instrument for both the universalization of religion and the establishment of an imperial world state” (P. 51)

There are hundreds upon hundreds of other such sources to back up the fact that Islam has absolutely nothing to do with peace.

For as long as this total lack of comprehension continues to dominate Western thinking, Islam will most definitely subjugate Christianity in Europe and the USA in the not too distant future, because the only way to stop and then reverse Islam’s invasion and subversion of both continents is by banning all forms of Sharia from taking root in every Christian country.